From: 	Jean Fraser
To:	DSenus@woodardcurran.com;  Errico, Thomas;  Margolis-Pineo, David;  Schmuckal, Marge
Date: 	10/3/2012 4:31 PM
Subject: 	Fwd: RE: Eldredge Lumber Level II review (165 Presumpscot)

Pl let me know if I missed or mis-represented something - thanks
(sent to Will Savage, PE, agent)

>>> Jean Fraser 10/3/2012 4:29 PM >>>
Will
 
We had a very preliminary review this morning and reviewers will be completing their reviews and sending me comments over the next week and then I will be able to send a more formal review letter.
 
In the meantime, several reviewers asked me to ask you for some additional information and it would expedite the review to ask these now rather than wait for the full review comments.  Please note these are preliminary  questions and I anticipate additional questions from reviewers in the near future.
 
Questions:
 
1.  The Traffic Review (including a review under city stds as well as whether TMP required) needs to know the previous (before Eldredge) and predicted levels of vehicle traffic generation and likely types of vehicles, as well as whether the traffic generation associated with this use is greater/same/less than the most intense (in traffic terms) previous use (within last 10 years).  So we need to compare the highest previous traffic generation with the traffic generation associated with this site plan (daily and peak hour).  We have found that lumberyards can potentially generate substantial traffic and so the traffic associated with this site needs to be understood and evaluated.  
 
2.  I don't think there is a parking analysis that shows how you concluded that the parking provision meets the zoning requirements;  this needs to identify the retail floor area.  
 
3.  Could you confirm what other parties have legal rights to use Parcel 2 for access to their properties?
 
4.  What type of pavement and drainage is currently located on Parcel 2?
 
thank you
Jean