From: 	Jean Fraser
To:	Louis, Penelope E. St
CC:	'TomGorrill';  Barhydt, Barbara;  Bartlett, Marshall W.;  Conway', 'Will;  Harris, Mark;  Linehan, Richard M.;  Sanders, Jeffrey;  WalterPochebit
Date: 	6/21/2013 12:24 PM
Subject: 	RE: MMC Addition -  request for information

Hello Penny,
 
The submissions are comprehensive and are under review;  I will be meeting with reviewers next week (Wednesday) to discuss any review comments that they may have.
 
I would like to draw your attention to a few items (mostly minor) where further information/detail is requested.   Its possible that there may be further comments next week. 
 
Items requested by Planning Board members:
How does the project fit into future MMC plans?
What times would the corridor lighting be on?
What are the operational hours of the operating rooms? (confirm info given at Workshop please);
Total number of employees based at the Bramhall Street campus;
Rendering that shows reflectivity of louvres and metal panels (accurately in comparison with the glass/fritted glass) on the north elevation.

Staff requests (some already alluded to at the Workshop)
Photometric information recently submitted:  please clarify what assumptions were made regarding the internal lighting sources/levels for the "Bean 2 Roof lights only" photometric plan;
Traffic Permit 1998 (further documentation please):
Where is the 49,150 sq ft medical office building which is permitted by the 1998 permit? 
The permit contains a number of conditions regarding revised on-street parking/signal timing/signage etc-  have these conditions been complied with?
The permit requires monitoring ("3t") at the intersection of Forest Street and Park Avenue-  has that monitoring taken place, and what did it conclude?
As mentioned at the Workshop, we would like a chronological list or table showing each separate change in the MMC Bramhall campus since 1998, stating the specific year of the change and the numbers of floorspace /employees /patient beds that changed that year.
FAA:   Please submit confirmation from the FAA that they are aware of the architecture of the proposed building and have no concerns regarding the intensity of skyglow within flightpaths, or glare/reflections from north elevation as seen from the runway (at other times of year when sun is lower than in the submitted illustration).  The FAA submitted documents appear to pertain only to the cranes used for construction.
 
Also I think it would be helpful to staff and Planning Board members who were not at the Workshop, to have sight of the Perkins + Will Workshop presentation slides, and would appreciate if these (or most of these where they do not duplicate the ones in the final submission) could be submitted asap;  a paper version would be fine.  
 
thank you
Jean
 
Jean Fraser, Planner
City of Portland
874 8728